My personal concerns about an SQR when I was first introduced to them when I entered this class is what exactly is one, and how well will I be able to do an SQR. When I found out that it stands for a Summary, Question, and Response I immediately was eager to find out what were the contents based on and what was the proper format of one. What I would really like to consider the group who is evaluating my SQR is to find out how well my paper is constructed. I would really like for them to proofread my paper and point out all the mistakes that I made, including miss pronunciations, incorrect use of commas, and all the other grammar mistakes that I did not point out myself.
I honestly believe that I evaluate my peers' paper very well, because I not only make responses to the questions while I am editing their papers, but I also proofread and point out the grammar errors that they made. My evaluations are very beneficial to the peers' paper that I evaluate on because I have learned the proper techniques over the years in English class on how to edit and revise a paper. When I revise a peers' paper, I usually read their papers more than one time and also read it aloud to see if it makes sense and if it does not, then I simply put on the paper what they need to do to make their paper sound effectively.
When I comment on my peers' papers I try to give the most constructive criticism as possible without hurting their feelings. Just because I do not want to hurt their feelings does not mean in any form that I am not going to be honest with all of the grammar mistakes that they committed. I will be very honest in revising their paper and tell them all of the errors that I came across and hopefully they do not take it the correct way.
No comments:
Post a Comment